202: The case against education (Bryan Caplan)

February 18, 2018 In this episode, economist Bryan Caplan argues that the main reason getting a college degree is valuable is because of signaling (i.e., it proves that you have traits that employers value, like conscientiousness and conformity), and not because college teaches you useful knowledge or skills. Julia proposes several potential challenges to Bryan’s argument, and … Read more

201: The cybersecurity dilemma (Ben Buchanan)

February 4, 2018 The security dilemma is a classic problem in geopolitics: Often when one nation takes measures to protect itself from attack (like adding to their stockpile of missiles), other nations see that and worry it means the first nation is preparing to attack them, which leads to a dangerous feedback loop of escalation. … Read more

200: How much should tech companies moderate speech? (Timothy Lee)

January 21, 2018 This episode features tech and policy journalist Timothy Lee, discussing a question that’s increasingly in the spotlight: How much should tech companies  be actively moderating their users’ speech? For example, should Facebook be trying to fight fake news? Should Twitter ban bullying? Should Reddit ban subreddits that they consider hate speech? Timothy and … Read more

198: Private truths, public lies (Timur Kuran)

December 10, 2017 In this episode, economist Timur Kuran explains the ubiquitous phenomenon of “preference falsification” — in which people claim to support something publicly even though they don’t support it privately — and describes its harmful effects on society. He and Julia explore questions like: Is preference falsification all bad? Are there ways to reduce it? … Read more

197: Why people think some things can’t be quantified – and why they’re wrong (Doug Hubbard)

November 12, 2017 In this episode Julia talks with Doug Hubbard, author of “How to Measure Anything,” about why people so often believe things are impossible to quantify like “innovation” or “quality of life.” For example, because people often have a deep misunderstanding of the meaning of probability. Or because they’re reluctant to violate “sacred taboos” by … Read more

196: Weird ideas and opaque minds (Eric Schwitzgebel)

October 29, 2017 Philosopher Eric Schwitzgebel returns to the show to explore several related questions: His taxonomy of the three different styles of thinker — “Truth,” “Dare,” and “Wonder” — and whether one of them is better than the others. His case for why it’s bad to interpret people “charitably.” And his seemingly paradoxical claim that we … Read more

195: Emerging technologies that’ll improve and/or ruin everything (Zach Weinersmith)

October 15, 2017 This episode features Zach Weinersmith, creator of the philosophical webcomic Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal, and the co-author (with his wife Kelly Weinersmith) of the new book Soonish: 10 Emerging Technologies That’ll Improve and/or Ruin Everything. Julia and Zach talk about which new technology is the most likely to happen, which would be most transformative, and … Read more

194: Why Buddhism is true (Robert Wright)

October 1, 2017 This episode features bestselling author Robert Wright making the case for why Buddhism was right about human nature: its diagnosis that our suffering is mainly due to a failure to see reality clearly, and its prescription that meditation can help us see more clearly. Robert and Julia discuss whether it’s suspicious that a religion … Read more